Oakland Raiders Score New Stadium Proposal in Bay Area

Oakland Raiders Score New Stadium Proposal in Bay Area

The Oakland Raiders are ready to pack their bags for Las Vegas, but one private investment company is hoping to persuade the storied franchise to stay put in California.

Mark Davis would like to move his Oakland Raiders to Las Vegas, but investors in the Bay Area are hoping he reconsiders.

Fortress Investment Group, a publicly traded investment management firm based in ny City, is dealing with former NFL celebrity and Hall of Fame user Ronnie Lott to preserve the Raiders in the Bay Area. This week, the organization resubmitted plans to a develop a brand new 55,000-seat stadium to keep owner Mark Davis in town.

The proposal is rumored to price $1.3 billion, and you will be funded through Fortress putting up $600 million, the NFL and Raiders investing $500 million, and the City of Oakland funding $200 million. The football that is pro confirmed to media outlets that it had received the submission.

The group that is same presented a similar proposition, but the NFL rejected it on grounds that more information was needed.

Las Vegas Calls Bluff

The local government largely seems to support the Oakland Raiders coming to the Mojave Desert while there are plenty of Las Vegas locals who are less than enthused about the possibility of an NFL team calling the town home.

Nevada has committed $750 million to building a 65,000-seat stadium that is domed steps through the Strip. The money will come with raising the hotel occupancy tax in Clark County.

Davis prefers the $1.9 billion Vegas deal over staying in Oakland, and Sin City lawmakers are not appearing worried that the united group owner is utilising the Bay Area as leverage.

‘I am in regular contact utilizing the Raiders. I don’t believe that remaining in Oakland can be an option for them,’ Clark County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak told the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Once looking like almost a thing that is sure Davis’ move to Nevada suffered a serious blow when Las Vegas Sands billionaire Sheldon Adelson withdrew his $650 million pledge to the arena in late January. The casino magnate became furious utilizing the Raiders after he felt the team went behind his back in presenting a rent agreement to the city which wasn’t contingent on Adelson’s involvement.

Vegas or Bust

All public evidence and statements from the owner pinpoint Vegas as the preferred home despite rumors that Davis might be considering staying in Oakland. Two banks that are unnamed since stepped up to cover the $650 million hole kept by Adelson’s departure.

The next step in the Las Vegas Raiders coming to fruition is for Davis to formalize a lease agreement with the town and come to financial terms on the arrangement. He formerly recommended that the team spend $1 a year in rent.

Davis will meet the vegas Stadium Authority on March 9 to talk about the contract. Once finalized, he is able to then make their situation to the NFL’s 31 other owners later this thirty days throughout a meeting in Phoenix.

Should three-fourths of the ownership support Davis’ moving, the united team would be cleared for Vegas.

Seminole Tribe Rejects Both Florida Gambling Bills

Florida’s Seminole Tribe may have just branched out into Atlantic City because of the purchase of the Taj, but, closer to home, their relationship with their state of Florida remains complicated.

Marcellus Osceola, Seminole Tribal Council chairman, said that neither of two bills into the Florida legislature would solve compact negotiations because neither of the make any economic sense for the tribe. (Image: Seminole Tribe of Florida)

Two competing bills within the Florida legislature each seek to locate different methods to the actual fact that tribe and state are unable to negotiate a compact that is new the previous one expired in 2015.

The Seminoles this week rejected both, even the one that’s supposedly designed to protect their interests.

A bill currently wending its method through the House would allow the Seminoles to be granted exclusivity on banked card games, as was the case with its compact that is previous in exchange for $3 billion in re payments to the state over seven years.

By comparison, a bill authored by the influential senator, Bill Galvano, would charge the Seminoles the same fee within the same timeline however for the best to offer craps and roulette, also blackjack.

Meanwhile, the right to offer blackjack would expand to parimutuel venues. Galvano’s bill would also, among other activities, authorize slots in eight counties outside South Florida.

Bargaining Power

In a letter to legislative leaders this week, Seminole Tribal Council chairman Marcellus Osceola said that while the House bill was ‘less objectionable,’ neither bills ‘make economic sense for the tribe.’


We think they are speaing frankly about the ‘$3 billion to the state’ bit.

The home bill is less objectionable because it’s essentially a status quo bill, an antidote to the rampant gambling expansion of Galvano’s proposal.

It is clear that, for the Seminoles, the thought of exclusivity on craps and roulette would not offset the increased competition from the proliferation of blackjack and slots throughout the state.

The tribe’s point-blank refusal is indicative of the its new-found leverage in the negotiations, thanks up to a court that is recent within their benefit.

$3 Billion Missed Opportunity

In December, a federal judge ruled that the Seminoles could continue to offer blackjack at their properties until 2030 since the state had violated the previous compact by allowing cardrooms and racetracks to offer banked card games and electronic blackjack at their premises.

Their state gambling regulator made a severe error of judgement in approving those games as well as the ruling deals the Seminoles a massive hand as the negotiations continue.

The Seminoles actually agreed the terms for the compact lay out inside your home bill this past year, in a deal negotiated with Governor Rick Scott, but the legislature neglected to pass it. It might have been the casino revenue-sharing deal that is biggest in the US.

But why would the Seminoles, who, incidentally, are still making payments that are large hawaii solely out of goodwill, agree to $3 billion over seven years now when they’re allowed to offer blackjack until 2030 anyway? The legislature had its chance but it well and undoubtedly missed the motorboat.

North Dakota Casino Bill Would Spend State in Commercial Gambling

A North Dakota casino proposal would put the state into the company of commercial gambling should it become law.

The Standing Rock protests are most likely likely to be rendered unsuccessful after President Trump ordered the pipeline task can progress. Native Us citizens in the continuing state might be in store for another round of bad news if voters approve a North Dakota casino bill. (Image: Helen Richardson/Denver Post)

Introduced by home Majority Leader Al Carlson (R-Fargo), Concurrent Resolution 3033 telephone calls for the construction of six state-owned gambling enterprises across the Upper Midwestern jurisdiction. The Republican is hoping to put a ballot concern before voters throughout the 2018 election that is primary.

‘Voters have actually shown us that they’re much more open-minded after they passed the marijuana that is medical,’ Carlson told the Forum Information provider, a cable news socket that covers the Dakotas. ‘It’s a revenue booster.’

Gambling in North Dakota happens to be restricted to tribal gambling enterprises, but blackjack, pull-tabs, and bingo are extensive in bars and taverns under charitable video gaming law.

Should voters embrace the thought of their state investing in the gambling company, Carlson’s measure would call for the resorts to become destination-oriented facilities that cater to a far reaching demographic. The bill would create a casino also video gaming commission.

Disruptive Law

Opponents to Carlson’s North Dakota casino bill say it would negatively impact groups that are tribal and potentially lead to smaller tax profits stemming from charitable gaming and the lottery.

Between 2013 and 2015, more than $43 million had been generated for charitable uses from non-tribal gambling, while the state’s general fund built-up $6.8 million.

North Dakota additionally gathers on Indian casinos through its lightweight with the brick-and-mortar resorts. Tribal groups pay between five and 5.5 percent of their net victory on Class III games (casino-style gaming that includes slots and table games) to Bismarck.

Under the Indian that is congressional Gaming Act, federally recognized tribes are allowed to supply Class we and II games on their sovereign lands. But to add dining table games, and the all-important slots, a compact should be reached with individual states.

Carlson’s bill would mandate that the state-owned casinos be at least 20 miles from a reservation that is indian and can’t be located within a community that’s population exceeds 5,000.

Between Rock and a Pipeline

Carlson’s casino expansion push truly does not come at a perfect time for tribal teams. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is currently in the midst of a highly publicized battle that is legal federal authorities over the Dakota Access Pipeline, something that President Donald Trump has authorized to go forward.

Protestors have flooded the area to help the tribe protect its land, but Trump’s orders give authorities the right to continue construction. The situation has cost the tribe dearly. The Sioux people say its Prairie Knights Casino & Resort has taken a $6 million hit, as visitors have stayed away because of the ongoing conflict.

Roads have been closed by protestors and agitators, while the contentious region has forced many would-be patrons to other video gaming establishments in North Dakota.

‘There’s simply no question that the protests . . . have had a significant impact on people’s ability to get to the casino and simply their comfort level driving down,’ tribal communication spokesman LaRoy Kingsley told The Washington instances month that is last.

Sands Bethlehem Reportedly on Sheldon Adelson’s Chopping Block

Sands Bethlehem, probably the most profitable casino in Pennsylvania, is apparently being pursued by an buyer that is unidentified. The resort is owned by billionaire Sheldon Adelson’s Las vegas, nevada Sands empire, and is the business’s only non-Las Las Vegas property that is domestic.

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is apparently in talks to sell Sands Bethlehem, a casino resort positioned in eastern Pennsylvania. (Image: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Sands Bethlehem CEO Mark Juliano informed employees through an email this that a sale was possible week.

Ron Reese, Sands’ VP of government relations and community development, said in a statement, ‘Las Vegas Sands is frequently approached about potential desire for various assets. The business has no announcement to make at this time.’

Of Pennsylvania’s 12 land-based casinos, Sands Bethlehem pulls in the cash that is most. The resort accumulated $305.3 million in gross slot terminal income during the last year that is fiscal and $228.1 million in gross revenue stemming from table games.

Opened in ’09, Las vegas, nevada Sands has spent $800 million in the hotel and casino. But with the continuing state mulling gaming expansion, such as the chance of legalizing internet casinos, Adelson is rumored to be done with the Keystone State.

Agitated Adelson

Worth more than $30 billion, Adelson is familiar with getting what he wants. That’s why some believe he’s furious that Pennsylvania lawmakers are pushing to authorize online gambling.

The Las vegas, nevada tycoon is really a staunch opponent to gambling online. He’s funding congressional efforts to pass the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that would essentially make internet gambling a beef that is federal and is behind the Coalition to end online Gambling (CSIG).

An advocate for internet gambling who has since retired in 2015, the group produced a video that targeted then-State Rep. John Payne. The CSIG said Payne was ‘working hard to legalize predatory online gambling’ and ‘putting families at risk. in the 30-second spot’

Juliano denounced internet gambling last summer when legislation had been first considered in Pennsylvania. ‘we have a big investment here. I don’t know where they think all these new clients are originating from,’ the administrator said in July.

In addition to online gambling, their state is mulling whether to allow airports to house slot machines, another ominous concern to land-based casino operators. Protection workers also unionized recently at Sands Bethlehem, and Adelson despises labor unions.

Money Matters Most

While the stoppage of online gambling is important to Adelson, Pennsylvania considering iCasinos is not most likely the culprit for the sale that is potential of Sands property. Instead, it’s more likely that their state’s recent tax hike on gambling is always to blame.

The legislature recently increased dining table game fees from 14 to 16 percent. That calculates into Sands paying about $4.6 million more to their state every year.

Juliano claims Pennsylvania is already one of the best tariffed gambling jurisdictions in America. But regardless, Sands Bethlehem announced fall that is last it had been moving forward having a $90 million expansion project.

The casino is within the procedure of enlarging its floor to allow for 1,000 brand new seats, and is making room for additional restaurants and better back-of-house facilities. The project had been confirmed just after the brand New Jersey ballot question presented to voters to end Atlantic City’s monopoly in the Garden State was rejected.